1 The most reliable way of running benchmarks is to do it in an otherwise idle
2 system. On a busy system, the results will vary according to the other tasks
3 demanding attention in the system.
5 We have managed to obtain quite reliable results by doing the following on
6 Linux (and you need root):
8 - switching the scheduler to a Real-Time mode
9 - setting the processor affinity to one single processor
10 - disabling the other thread of the same core
12 This should work rather well for CPU-intensive tasks. A task that is in Real-
13 Time mode will simply not be preempted by the OS. But if you make OS syscalls,
14 especially I/O ones, your task will be de-scheduled. Note that this includes
15 page faults, so if you can, make sure your benchmark's warmup code paths touch
18 To do this you need a tool called schedtool (package schedtool), from
19 http://freequaos.host.sk/schedtool/
21 From this point on, we are using CPU0 for all tasks:
23 If you have a Hyperthreaded multi-core processor (Core-i5 and Core-i7), you
24 have to disable the other thread of the same core as CPU0. To discover which
27 $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/topology/thread_siblings_list
29 This will print something like 0,4, meaning that CPUs 0 and 4 are sibling
30 threads on the same core. So we'll turn CPU 4 off:
33 # echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu4/online
35 To turn it back on, echo 1 into the same file.
37 To run a task on CPU 0 exclusively, using FIFO RT priority 10, you run the
41 # schedtool -F -p 10 -a 1 -e ./taskname
44 # schedtool -F -p 10 -a 1 -e ./tst_bench_qstring -tickcounter
46 Warning: if your task livelocks or takes far too long to complete, your system
47 may be unusable for a long time, especially if you don't have other cores to
48 run stuff on. To prevent that, run it before schedtool and time it.
50 You can also limit the CPU time that the task is allowed to take. Run in the
51 same shell as you'll run schedtool:
54 To limit to 300 seconds (5 minutes)
56 If your task runs away, it will get a SIGXCPU after consuming 5 minutes of CPU
57 time (5 minutes running at 100%).
59 If your app is multithreaded, you may want to give it more CPUs, like CPU0 and
60 CPU1 with -a 3 (it's a bitmask).
62 For best results, you should disable ALL other cores and threads of the same
63 processor. The new Core-i7 have one processor with 4 cores,
64 each core can run 2 threads; the older Mac Pros have two processors with 4
65 cores each. So on those Mac Pros, you'd disable cores 1, 2 and 3, while on the
66 Core-i7, you'll need to disable all other CPUs.
68 However, disabling just the sibling thread seems to produce very reliable
69 results for me already, with variance often below 0.5% (even though there are
70 some measurable spikes).
74 Running the benchmark with highest priority, i.e. "sudo nice -19"
75 usually produces stable results on some machines. If the benchmark also
76 involves displaying something on the screen (on X11), running it with
77 "-sync" is a must. Though, in that case the "real" cost is not correct,
78 but it is useful to discover regressions.
80 Also; not many people know about ionice (1)
81 ionice - get/set program io scheduling class and priority