"parts" is an unnecessary word here.
authorBradley M. Kuhn <bkuhn@ebb.org>
Fri, 12 Oct 2012 09:24:50 +0000 (11:24 +0200)
committerBradley M. Kuhn <bkuhn@ebb.org>
Fri, 12 Oct 2012 09:24:50 +0000 (11:24 +0200)
commit3f3de53e6b4b8cb9525408ec33c6106dacaed62a
treec57cf1a877451e1bcec57c8c2d7de0fc66d8d2de
parent9754ccad20762b1cf5744d54faeba806a05b2e54
"parts" is an unnecessary word here.

I don't see a specific difference between "all parts of the Covered Work"
and "all of the Covered Work".  Since Covered Work is a defined term, if
anything, "parts" should be included in its definition.  However, I tend
to believe it just isn't necessary.  "all of the Covered Work" means "all
parts".  How could it not?
Drafts/copyleft-next